Discoveries and scientific theories are excluded from patent protection; only applicable technical solutions may qualify.
Can discoveries and scientific theories be protected by a patent in the Philippines? Read More »
In commissioned work, the commissioning party owns the patent by default unless the contract states otherwise.
Who owns a commissioned invention under Philippine patent law? Read More »
New forms of known drug substances are not patentable unless they significantly enhance efficacy.
How does Philippine law treat new forms of known drug substances for patent purposes? Read More »
If inventive activity is not part of regular duties, the employee owns the patent even using employer resources.
Who owns an invention made by an employee that is outside his regular duties? Read More »
Pure computer programs, business schemes, and mental methods are excluded from patent protection.
Are computer programs and business methods patentable in the Philippines? Read More »
Employer owns inventions resulting from regularly assigned duties, unless an express or implied agreement provides otherwise.
When does an employer own an invention made by its employee? Read More »
Medical and surgical treatment methods are not patentable, but related products and compositions may be.
Are methods of medical or surgical treatment patentable under Philippine patent law? Read More »
Plant varieties and animal breeds are excluded from patents, although special sui generis protection may be legislated.
Can plant varieties and animal breeds be covered by patents in the Philippines? Read More »
Purely aesthetic creations are not patentable because patent law protects technical solutions, not mere appearance.
Are purely aesthetic creations eligible for patents in the Philippines? Read More »
Inventions contrary to public order or morality are excluded from patent protection regardless of technical merit.
Can an invention be refused a patent for reasons of public order or morality? Read More »
