Innovative Startup Act Exemptions – Helping Foreign Tech Founders Bypass Traditional Minimum Capital Rules

Introduction: why the “USD 200,000 minimum capital” matters to foreign founders

Foreign founders entering the Philippine market often encounter a recurring barrier: the minimum paid-in capital rule for certain domestic market enterprises (DMEs). In many service-oriented or technology-driven businesses that primarily sell to the Philippine market, regulators typically look for a minimum paid-in equity threshold before allowing a company to be majority- or fully foreign-owned.

The Innovative Startup Act (R.A. No. 11337, 2019) creates a government-recognized lane for qualified startups and startup enablers. When properly endorsed/certified as an “innovative startup,” a foreign-led venture may qualify for a reduced minimum paid-in capital requirement—often discussed as a way to avoid the otherwise prohibitive USD 200,000 benchmark in applicable cases.

Governing laws and issuances

The main authorities relevant to the “minimum capital” issue and the startup endorsement route include:

• R.A. No. 11337 (2019) or the Innovative Startup Act, which establishes state support mechanisms for innovative startups, including startup visas and the broader startup development program.
• IRR of R.A. No. 11337 (2019), which supplies implementing details and policy direction for operationalizing the Act.
• SEC OGC Opinion No. 24-19 (2024), which discusses how foreign ownership is assessed for DMEs and explains that the minimum paid-in capital threshold may drop to USD 100,000 when the enterprise is endorsed as a startup under R.A. No. 11337.
• SEC OGC Opinion No. 24-32 (2024), which restates the same DME minimum paid-in capital structure and emphasizes the need for appropriate endorsement and compliance documentation.
• SEC OGC Opinion No. 26-07 (2026), which reiterates the general DME minimum paid-in capital treatment and shows how the SEC continues to apply the “USD 200,000 general rule / USD 100,000 exception” approach in current guidance.

What is the “USD 200,000 minimum paid-in capital rule” in plain terms?

For many businesses that sell mainly to the Philippine market (i.e., DMEs), foreign equity participation beyond 40% can trigger a minimum paid-in equity requirement commonly described as USD 200,000. In SEC guidance, if the required minimum paid-in equity is not met, the enterprise may be treated as partly nationalized (often described in practice as effectively constrained to 40% foreign ownership), and compliance concerns may arise under related nationality-control rules.

In SEC OGC Opinion No. 24-19 (2024), the SEC explained the general approach: a foreign entity may own more than 40% of a DME only if the paid-in capital meets the applicable minimum; otherwise, foreign participation is limited and may implicate restrictions associated with partly nationalized activities.

The Innovative Startup Act “exemption” concept: lowering the minimum to USD 100,000 through startup endorsement

What many foreign tech founders are looking for is not an across-the-board removal of capitalization rules, but a recognized exception where the minimum paid-in equity threshold is reduced.

SEC guidance recognizes a reduced minimum paid-in capital of USD 100,000 (instead of USD 200,000) for certain micro and small DMEs when any of the following conditions apply:

• the enterprise involves advanced technology as determined by the DOST; or
• the enterprise is endorsed as a startup or startup enabler by the relevant host/lead host agency under R.A. No. 11337 (2019); or
• the enterprise commits that a majority of direct employees are Filipinos, with a minimum headcount requirement commonly stated as at least fifteen (15) Filipino employees.

This “startup endorsement” pathway is reflected in SEC OGC Opinion No. 24-19 (2024), SEC OGC Opinion No. 24-32 (2024), and SEC OGC Opinion No. 26-07 (2026). These issuances are frequently cited by incorporators and counsel because they translate the rule into how the SEC evaluates proposed ownership structures during registration and compliance reviews.

Who benefits most: global tech founders building a Philippine-based DME

The startup endorsement route is most relevant when all or most of the following are true:

• the business is a service or tech-enabled service company primarily selling to Philippine customers (i.e., a DME rather than an export enterprise);
• the founders want the Philippine company to be majority foreign-owned or 100% foreign-owned (where permitted by the nature of the activity); and
• the investors prefer to allocate capital to product and growth rather than satisfy a higher regulatory paid-in equity number.

How “startup” status is used legally: endorsement and documentation

In practice, what matters is not marketing language (“we are a startup”), but government-recognized endorsement consistent with R.A. No. 11337 (2019). SEC opinions repeatedly frame the reduced threshold around being endorsed as startup or startup enabler by the appropriate lead host agencies under the Act (e.g., DTI, DICT, or DOST, depending on the case), as discussed in SEC OGC Opinion No. 24-32 (2024).

Because the minimum paid-in equity rule is often evaluated during incorporation, amendments, or investment entry, founders typically prepare a compliance file that includes proof of startup endorsement and corporate records showing the paid-in equity amount.

Startup visas: an additional advantage for foreign founders and foreign hires

Beyond capitalization, R.A. No. 11337 (2019) also provides for startup visas to support foreign participation in endorsed startups and startup enablers.

Under Section 13 of R.A. No. 11337 (2019), the DFA is directed to create startup owner, startup employee, and startup investor visas for qualified foreign nationals connected with startups or startup enablers registered in the Philippines. These visas have an initial validity of five (5) years and may be renewed/extended, and the law states that bearers are exempt from securing an Alien Employment Permit (AEP), subject to implementing rules to be issued by the DFA, BI, and DOLE.

Limits and cautions: what the “startup endorsement” does not automatically fix

Foreign founders should treat the endorsement as a compliance advantage, not a blanket clearance. Common limitations include:

• Activity restrictions still apply. If an enterprise falls under constitutional/statutory foreign equity limits, endorsement as a startup does not remove those limits. (Based on internal knowledge of Philippine law.)
• DME classification still matters. SEC guidance emphasizes that whether an entity is a DME can be determinative because the minimum paid-in capital thresholds are discussed in the DME context (SEC OGC Opinion No. 24-19, 2024).
• Minimum capital is reduced, not erased. The typical result is shifting from the USD 200,000 general threshold to the USD 100,000 threshold if the company qualifies via endorsement/advanced technology/Filipino employment commitments (SEC OGC Opinion No. 24-32, 2024; SEC OGC Opinion No. 26-07, 2026).

Typical scenarios (with examples)

Scenario 1: Foreign SaaS founder targeting Philippine SMEs. A Delaware founder wants a Philippine subsidiary that sells HR and payroll software locally. If treated as a DME and the founder wants majority foreign ownership, the paid-in equity level becomes central. If the company is endorsed as an innovative startup under R.A. No. 11337 (2019), the founder may argue for the USD 100,000 minimum rather than USD 200,000, consistent with SEC OGC Opinion No. 24-19 (2024).

Scenario 2: Foreign-led AI studio with Filipino engineers. If the enterprise meets criteria such as advanced technology or qualifies for startup endorsement, it may use the same reduced minimum threshold described in SEC OGC Opinion No. 24-32 (2024). Separately, hiring foreign specialists may be supported by the startup visa mechanism under R.A. No. 11337 (2019).

Summary table: USD 200,000 vs USD 100,000 minimum paid-in capital (as discussed in SEC guidance)

Item	General rule often applied to DMEs	When reduced to USD 100,000
Minimum paid-in equity commonly referenced	USD 200,000	USD 100,000
What triggers the reduced threshold	Not applicable	Advanced technology (DOST); or endorsed as startup/startup enabler under R.A. No. 11337; or Filipino employment undertaking
Illustrative authority	SEC OGC Opinion No. 24-19 (2024)	SEC OGC Opinion No. 24-19 (2024); SEC OGC Opinion No. 24-32 (2024); SEC OGC Opinion No. 26-07 (2026)

How courts view treaty/policy questions (and why it matters only indirectly here)

While the startup capitalization issue is largely administrative and statutory, foreign founders sometimes ask whether international commitments can override domestic restrictions. The Supreme Court has emphasized that constitutional limits and statutory reservations remain controlling where incorporated in treaty arrangements and that certain policy choices in foreign relations are generally political questions unless there is grave abuse of discretion, as discussed in Initiatives for Dialogue and Empowerment Through Alternative Legal Services, Inc., et al. v. Senate of the Philippines, et al., G.R. No. 184635 and G.R. No. 185366, 2023.

For founders, the takeaway is straightforward: structure the investment around Philippine statutes and implementing rules, rather than relying on generalized arguments about openness to foreign investment.

Final observations and recommendations

For global tech entrepreneurs, the Innovative Startup Act route can materially reduce the capital barrier in situations where a DME would otherwise need to meet a higher paid-in equity figure to support majority or full foreign ownership.

• Confirm whether the business is a DME. Classification affects whether the minimum paid-in equity thresholds are relevant (SEC OGC Opinion No. 24-19, 2024).
• Secure the proper startup endorsement. The reduced USD 100,000 threshold is repeatedly linked in SEC guidance to being endorsed as a startup or startup enabler under R.A. No. 11337 (SEC OGC Opinion No. 24-32, 2024).
• Align immigration planning with startup visas. If foreign founders, investors, or staff will be based in the Philippines, assess eligibility under the startup visa categories in R.A. No. 11337 (2019).
• Check for sector-specific foreign equity caps. Startup status is helpful, but it does not automatically remove constitutional or statutory nationality limits. (Based on internal knowledge of Philippine law.)

About Nicolas and De Vega Law Offices

 Nicolas and de Vega Law Offices is a full-service law firm in the Philippines.  You may visit us at the 16th Flr., Suite 1607 AIC Burgundy Empire Tower, ADB Ave., Ortigas Center, 1605 Pasig City, Metro Manila, Philippines.  You may also call us at +632 84706126, +632 84706130, +632 84016392 or e-mail us at [email protected]. Visit our website https://ndvlaw.com.