How Did RA 10951 Change Theft Thresholds?
RA 10951 updated theft thresholds and penalties affecting corporate property, including qualified theft by employees who abuse a position of trust.
RA 10951 updated theft thresholds and penalties affecting corporate property, including qualified theft by employees who abuse a position of trust.
Learn when employee theft becomes qualified theft in the Philippines, how grave abuse of confidence is proven, and why penalties are much heavier.
R.A. No. 10951 changed theft penalties by revising property-value brackets, affecting qualified theft and corporate asset cases.
Learn how Philippine law treats daily employee embezzlement, delito continuado, qualified theft, and separate takings over several years.
How Does Philippine Law Treat Daily Employee Embezzlement? Read More »
Learn how Philippine law classifies and penalizes the theft of tires, batteries, accessories, and spare parts from privately parked automobiles.
How Are Motor Vehicle Spare Parts Theft Prosecuted? Read More »
Learn how to file qualified theft complaints against household staff, prove Article 310 violations, and establish the proper penalty under Philippine law.
How Are Qualified Theft Complaints Filed Against Household Staff? Read More »
Learn when a private caretaker selling estate fruit, crops, or timber without consent may face qualified theft charges under Philippine law.
Can a Caretaker Be Charged for Selling Estate Produce? Read More »
Can outsiders be prosecuted for inducing household staff to commit qualified theft? Learn the rules on inducement, complicity, evidence, and defenses.
Can Outsiders Be Prosecuted for Inducing Household Theft? Read More »
Learn when private couriers may face qualified theft charges for taking electronics or cash-on-delivery payments under Article 310.
Learn when a private caretaker’s unauthorized taking of farm equipment may constitute qualified theft under Article 310 of the Revised Penal Code.
Can a Private Caretaker Face Qualified Theft Charges? Read More »