Learn how R.A. No. 10951 affects estafa, fines, imprisonment, complex crimes, and criminal liability in Philippine corporate fraud cases.
Does R.A. No. 10951 Increase White-Collar Penalties? Read More »
Learn when prosecutorial delay in corporate fraud complaints may violate the Constitution, support mandamus, or lead to liability under Article 208.
Can Prosecutors Be Prosecuted for Judicial Delays? Read More »
RA 10951 increased estafa thresholds and reduced penalties in many corporate fraud cases, subject to proven damage and retroactive application.
How Does RA 10951 Change Estafa Penalties? Read More »
Learn when a CEO may face criminal liability as a principal by inducement for directing subordinates to commit fraud or misappropriate funds.
Can a CEO Be Jailed for Ordering Fraud? Read More »
Learn how Philippine law penalizes fraudulent capital stock decreases, false valuations, misleading financial reports, and unlawful returns to shareholders.
What Are the Penalties for Fraudulent Capital Stock Decreases? Read More »
Learn how Philippine law distinguishes contract breach from corporate fraud and how businesses can respond to SEC complaints alleging public deception.
When Does a Contract Breach Become Corporate Fraud? Read More »
SEC compliance in the Philippines: learn when late GIS/AFS filings stay administrative and when misrepresentation becomes corporate fraud with criminal risk.
When SEC Non-Compliance Escalates to Criminal Fraud in the Philippines Read More »
