Securing Music Sync Licenses for Video Games: Negotiating Audio Rights for Locally Developed Entertainment (Philippine Law Guide for Foreign Publishers)

Introduction: why music clearance matters for global game releases

Foreign publishers distributing a video game globally often treat music as “content already cleared” by the local developer. Under Philippine law, that assumption can be costly. Using a Filipino song in a game commonly involves multiple protected rights (composition, sound recording, and performer’s rights), and multiple rightsholders (composer/publisher, record label, performers). If a publisher releases without full clearance, the release can expose the publisher and its partners to infringement claims in the Philippines, including for online availability and in-game playback.

Governing Philippine law for in-game music use

The primary statute is the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines (Republic Act No. 8293, 1997), as amended by Republic Act No. 10372 (2013). The IP Code protects copyrighted works from the moment of creation and grants copyright owners exclusive economic rights, including public performance and communication to the public—rights that become especially relevant when a game is distributed digitally, streamed, or otherwise made accessible online.

For neighboring rights (rights related to copyright), the IP Code also recognizes and protects the rights of performers, producers of sound recordings, and related defined terms such as sound recording and audiovisual work or fixation. These definitions matter when the publisher uses an existing recording (the “master”) rather than commissioning a new recording. Republic Act No. 10372 further modernized these protections and explicitly covers “making available” type uses that commonly occur in digital distribution.

What “sync license” means in a video game context under Philippine law

In industry practice, a “sync license” usually refers to permission to synchronize a musical composition with visual content. In games, “sync” can include: (a) embedding a song into gameplay; (b) using it in a cinematic cutscene; (c) using it in trailers and marketing assets; and (d) using it in user-generated or interactive contexts (e.g., character radios, rhythm modes, or dynamic music systems).

Under Philippine law, these uses often intersect with the owner’s exclusive economic rights such as reproduction, adaptation/arrangement (if you edit or loop), and rights involving public performance or communication to the public, depending on how the game is distributed and accessed. The Supreme Court has affirmed the centrality of these exclusive rights for music, including the exclusive right of public performance and related communication to the public concepts in commercial settings.

Rights you usually need to clear for Filipino music in games

For foreign publishers, the safest approach is to clear rights in layers. A single “song” can require several permissions.

1) Composition rights (the musical work)

This is the underlying composition—melody, harmony, lyrics (if any). Where a collective management organization (CMO) is involved, licensing may be handled by the CMO as assignee/representative of the composers and publishers. The Supreme Court has recognized that copyright owners may assign rights and authorize a CMO to enforce and administer licensing, and that the validity/enforceability of such assignment is not dependent on publication in the IPO Gazette.

In the Philippines, the Filipino Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers, Inc. (FILSCAP) is recognized by the Supreme Court as a government-accredited CMO assisting music users to obtain authorization for public performance and related uses.

2) Sound recording (“master”) rights

If you will use an existing studio recording, you generally need permission from the producer of the sound recording(often the label) who took the initiative and responsibility for the first fixation of sounds. The IP Code defines “sound recording” and “producer of a sound recording,” which is critical when determining who can sign the master-use license.

3) Performer’s rights

Separate from the composition and the master, performers (singers, musicians, etc.) have protected rights. As amended by Republic Act No. 10372, performers have explicit rights to authorize reproduction, distribution, rental, and “making available” of their fixed performances, subject to limitations in the law. For a foreign publisher, this matters most when the recording agreement or label contract did not fully secure performer permissions for downstream uses like games and global digital releases.

How “public performance” and “communication to the public” can matter for games

Even when a game is “sold,” modern distribution frequently involves online delivery, updates, in-game events, streams, and on-demand access. Philippine jurisprudence emphasizes that commercial establishments that allow copyrighted music to be heard by a public audience can commit actionable public performance without a proper license. The Supreme Court also recognized that a CMO may enforce these rights on behalf of owners through assignments, and that unlicensed uses in public/commercial contexts can lead to liability.

For digital distribution and on-demand access models, Republic Act No. 10372’s updates to related rights and the “making available” concept are particularly relevant for publishers offering downloadable content, live-service music drops, and cloud-based access.

Step-by-step: legal clearance process for foreign publishers

Step 1: identify what music is being used and how

Start with a clearance cue sheet listing every track, version, and context of use, including:

Use types: in-game background, cutscenes, menu music, trailer, influencer kits, esports broadcasts, livestreams, DLC, and patches.

Technical uses: full track vs. excerpt, looping, stems, remixes, and dynamic layering (which may imply adaptation/arrangement issues).

Step 2: determine whether you are using (a) an existing recording or (b) a new recording

If you commission a new recording, you still need composition rights and should ensure the recording contract secures producer and performer rights clearly for worldwide game exploitation. If you use an existing master, you will need master rights and must confirm performer permissions were obtained for your intended uses.

Step 3: confirm who owns/controls each layer of rights

For Filipino music, rights may be split across:

• Composer(s) and music publisher(s) (composition)
• Record label/producer (master)
• Performers (neighboring rights)
• CMO/collective administrator (commonly for public performance licensing)

Step 4: obtain the correct licenses (and keep them aligned)

As a minimum set, foreign publishers typically secure:

• Composition (sync) license from the composer/publisher or their authorized representative/assignee
• Master-use license from the sound recording producer/label (if using an existing recording)
• Performer permissions (often bundled via label contracts, but should be verified)

Where the use includes public performance and communication to the public in commercial contexts, clearance may involve the relevant licensing channels used in the Philippines (including CMOs, depending on the right being administered). Supreme Court rulings recognize FILSCAP’s standing to enforce assigned music rights and collect license fees for public performance-type uses.

Step 5: ensure territory, term, media, and platforms match “global” reality

For a global release, license grants should match real distribution:

• Territory: worldwide (or explicitly including the Philippines and all launch countries)
• Platforms: console, PC, mobile, cloud gaming, subscription services
• Media: in-game, trailers, ads, storefront videos, social media marketing
• Term: preferably perpetual or long enough to avoid delisting risk

Step 6: document retention and audit readiness

Maintain a complete clearance package: contracts, chain-of-title, cue sheets, proof of payment, and correspondence confirming scope. Philippine case law shows that CMOs and rightsholders may sue and enforce rights based on assignments, and documentation is essential to defend a release.

Negotiation points foreign publishers should address in music deals

Scope and use controls

Define permitted uses: interactive playback, looping, cutscene sync, dynamic remixing, user-generated clips, and mod support. If you will alter the track (edit, remix, stem separation), include explicit permission consistent with the owner’s exclusive rights.

Most-favored territory and platform clauses

Because digital storefronts and advertising are borderless, ensure the grant does not exclude territories where the publisher markets or sells the game.

Royalty structure and reporting

Common commercial models include flat fees, unit-based royalties, revenue share, or tiered royalties based on platforms. Where CMOs administer particular rights (commonly performance-related), clarify whether your fee is inclusive or separate.

Warranties, indemnities, and takedown/delisting mechanics

Require representations that the licensor controls the granted rights and that performer/label permissions are complete. Provide a cure period and a replacement music option to avoid forced delisting if a dispute arises.

Credits and moral-rights-sensitive requests

Even when the focus is economic rights licensing, credits and integrity concerns should be handled contractually, especially for edits or contextual use (violent content, political content, etc.).

Common scenarios (with publisher-focused guidance)

Scenario A: The developer says “we licensed the song already”

Ask: licensed what, and for which uses? A local-only license or a license limited to trailers may not cover worldwide in-game embedding and perpetual digital availability. Require the full text of the license and verify scope.

Scenario B: Using a popular Filipino track with an existing commercial recording

You likely need at least two separate deals: one for the composition and one for the master. Confirm if any CMO-administered rights are implicated for your distribution model, and confirm performer permissions for game and online availability uses.

Scenario C: Streaming gameplay and esports events include the song

Publisher marketing often includes official streams, tournament broadcasts, and clips. Clearance should explicitly include promotional and broadcast-like uses; otherwise, the publisher may face claims tied to public performance or communication to the public theories recognized in Philippine jurisprudence for commercial audiences.

Summary table: what to clear for Filipino music in video games

Right / Asset	Usually licensed from	Typical game uses
Composition (musical work)	Composer / music publisher / authorized assignee (may involve a CMO for certain rights)	In-game music, cutscenes, trailers, menu themes, adaptations/edits
Sound recording (master)	Producer of sound recording / label	Using the original studio track inside the game and marketing materials
Performer’s rights (fixed performance)	Performers or label/producer if properly contracted	Digital distribution, “making available,” reproductions and copies tied to the master

Selected Philippine authorities supporting music licensing and enforcement

• Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines (Republic Act No. 8293, 1997): definitions for performers, sound recordings, audiovisual works/fixations, and protection of economic rights relevant to music exploitation.
• Republic Act No. 10372 (2013): amendments strengthening digital-era protections, including “making available” concepts for related rights (e.g., performers’ rights).
• Filipino Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers, Inc. v. Andrey, Inc. (G.R. No. 233918, 2022): playing broadcasts with copyrighted music in commercial establishments is a public performance requiring a license; foreign “business exemption” concepts do not apply; not covered by fair use or statutory limitations for that setting.
• Cosac, Inc. v. Filipino Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers, Inc. (G.R. No. 222537, 2023): assignment of rights to a CMO like FILSCAP does not require IPO Gazette publication to be valid/enforceable; FILSCAP recognized as authorized to enforce assigned rights.
• Philippine Home Cable Holdings, Inc. v. Filipino Society of Composers, Authors & Publishers, Inc. (G.R. No. 188933, 2023): confirms FILSCAP’s recognized role as an accredited CMO and discusses infringement concepts tied to making content accessible to the public under rights recognized by the IP Code.

Compliance advice for foreign publishers releasing worldwide

• Do not rely on a “single sync license” label. Confirm composition, master, and performer layers are cleared for worldwide game distribution and marketing.
• Build a clearance checklist into your publishing contract. Make music clearance a condition precedent to launch, with deliverables (chain-of-title, cue sheets, executed licenses).
• License for the real digital footprint. Include trailers, storefront videos, social media, influencer kits, tournament broadcasts, and updates/DLC.
• Plan for disputes. Include replacement music rights, a cure period, and indemnities aligned with delisting risks.

Conclusion: how to clear Filipino music with lower launch and delisting risk

For foreign publishers, clearing Filipino music for a global video game release requires rights-layering discipline: secure composition permissions, master rights (if using existing recordings), and performer permissions where relevant, then align the grant with worldwide digital distribution and marketing. Philippine jurisprudence recognizes strong enforceability of music rights, including public performance-related licensing and a CMO’s authority to enforce assigned rights. A clearance package that matches the game’s actual uses is the simplest way to reduce infringement exposure and avoid forced post-launch content takedowns.

About Nicolas and De Vega Law Offices

 Nicolas and de Vega Law Offices is a full-service law firm in the Philippines.  You may visit us at the 16th Flr., Suite 1607 AIC Burgundy Empire Tower, ADB Ave., Ortigas Center, 1605 Pasig City, Metro Manila, Philippines.  You may also call us at +632 84706126, +632 84706130, +632 84016392 or e-mail us at [email protected]. Visit our website https://ndvlaw.com.