Usufruct Agreements in the Philippines: Keep the Land Title While Granting Use and Enjoyment to Another

Introduction: Why usufruct is used in family and corporate arrangements

A usufruct is often chosen when the owner wants to retain ownership of land (or other property) but allow another person to possess, use, and benefit from the property or its fruits for a defined period, commonly for the beneficiary’s lifetime. This setup is frequently seen between parents and children (estate and succession planning) and in corporate structures (e.g., a company retains title while allowing officers, founders, or beneficiaries to use property under controlled terms).

Done correctly, a usufruct can preserve title in the owner’s name while providing the other party legally enforceable rights of enjoyment—often reducing family conflict and clarifying who may occupy, collect rentals, or receive produce from the property.

What a usufruct is under Philippine law

Under the Civil Code, usufruct gives a right to enjoy the property of another with the obligation of preserving its form and substance, unless the title constituting it or the law provides otherwise (Civil Code of the Philippines, 1949, Article 562). The law recognizes that usufruct may be constituted by law, by the will of private persons (inter vivos or testamentary), and by prescription (Civil Code of the Philippines, 1949, Article 563).

In simple terms, usufruct splits rights over property into two layers:

1) Ownership (naked title) remains with the owner, including the power to dispose (subject to the usufruct).

2) Enjoyment—use, possession, and entitlement to fruits—belongs to the usufructuary during the term of the usufruct.

Usufruct versus ownership and lease (quick distinctions)

The differences matter because parties often confuse usufruct with a lease or an informal “permission to stay.” Usufruct creates a real right (enforceable against the world once properly constituted and, for registered land, typically annotated), while a lease is a contract right and tolerance can be revoked more easily.

Summary comparison table

Note: Table presented in HTML-friendly form below.

Arrangement	Who owns the property?	Who possesses/uses it?	Who gets the fruits (e.g., rent, produce)?	Typical use
Usufruct	Owner keeps naked title (Civil Code, 1949, Article 562)	Usufructuary (Civil Code, 1949, Article 562)	Usufructuary gets natural/industrial/civil fruits, unless limited by the title (Civil Code, 1949, Article 566)	Parents/children, estate planning, corporate property use
Lease	Lessor remains owner	Lessee (per contract)	Lessor gets rent; lessee enjoys use	Renting residential/commercial property
Mere tolerance	Owner	Occupant by permission	No defined legal entitlement	Informal family occupancy (high dispute risk)

Governing laws and leading Supreme Court rulings

Civil Code provisions on usufruct are the primary authority, particularly on definition, rights, obligations, and extinguishment (Civil Code of the Philippines, 1949, Articles 562–612).

Supreme Court guidance on possession and enforceability shows how usufruct operates in real disputes:

In Fernandez, et al. v. Fernandez (2024), the Court recognized that where the documents grant the usufructuary “full control and possession” during her lifetime, the usufructuary is entitled to exclusive possession; any continued stay by a co-owner may be treated as mere tolerance that becomes illegal once a valid demand to vacate is made, supporting an unlawful detainer action.

In Moralidad v. Pernes (2006), the Court recognized that usufruct may be subject to resolutory conditions stated in the instrument creating it; when the condition occurs, termination may be warranted and the owner may recover possession.

Who is entitled to the fruits and income

As a general rule, the usufructuary is entitled to all natural, industrial, and civil fruits of the property (Civil Code of the Philippines, 1949, Article 566). Civil fruits (such as rentals) are deemed to accrue daily and belong to the usufructuary in proportion to the time the usufruct lasts (Civil Code of the Philippines, 1949, Article 569).

This is one reason usufruct is used when a parent wants a child to receive rental income from a building while the parent retains title, or when a company wants to keep property ownership but permit a person to occupy and benefit from it under defined limits.

How a usufruct is created: common setups and document options

The Civil Code allows usufruct to be constituted by private persons through acts inter vivos or by last will and testament (Civil Code of the Philippines, 1949, Article 563). In everyday planning, the common structures include:

• Inter vivos contract of usufruct (owner grants usufruct to another, for a term or lifetime).
• Donation with reserved usufruct (owner donates naked title but reserves usufruct for self; the Civil Code recognizes special rules where the donor reserves usufruct, including on security requirements) (Civil Code of the Philippines, 1949, Article 584).
• Will-based usufruct (usufruct in a testamentary disposition).

Drafting tip: The “title constituting the usufruct” is crucial because it can expand, limit, or condition the usufructuary’s rights, subject to law (Civil Code of the Philippines, 1949, Article 565). If you want restrictions (e.g., residential use only, no leasing, no commercial use), the instrument should say so clearly.

Essential clauses in a usufruct agreement (what to put in writing)

Well-drafted usufruct agreements reduce disputes, especially among heirs and co-owners. Typical provisions include:

• Identification of property (title number, technical description, improvements).
• Scope of rights granted: possession, use, access, and whether enjoyment is exclusive or shared. Courts look at wording such as “full control and possession” to infer exclusivity (Fernandez, et al. v. Fernandez, 2024).
• Fruits and income: who collects rent, who signs leases (if leasing is allowed), and how collections are accounted for (Civil Code of the Philippines, 1949, Articles 566 and 569).
• Permitted and prohibited uses: residential-only, no commercial use, no subleasing, no alterations without consent.
• Repairs and improvements: the usufructuary may make useful improvements or expenses for pleasure, but generally has no right to indemnity, though removal may be allowed if no damage results (Civil Code of the Philippines, 1949, Article 579).
• Inventory and security: before enjoyment, the usufructuary is generally obliged to make an inventory and give security (Civil Code of the Philippines, 1949, Article 583), unless excused when no one will be injured (Civil Code of the Philippines, 1949, Article 585). If the arrangement is a donation with reserved usufruct or parents as usufructuaries of children’s property, special rules apply (Civil Code of the Philippines, 1949, Article 584).
• Termination events: death, term expiration, resolutory conditions, loss of property, merger, renunciation, prescription (Civil Code of the Philippines, 1949, Article 603). If you want conditional termination (e.g., serious family conflict, breach of use restrictions), the condition should be clearly stated, consistent with Moralidad v. Pernes (2006).
• Turnover upon termination: duty to deliver property to owner upon termination, subject to the usufructuary’s right of retention for reimbursable items (Civil Code of the Philippines, 1949, Article 612).

Typical scenarios and how usufruct functions

Scenario 1: Parents retain title, child enjoys rentals. A parent keeps ownership of an apartment building but grants a lifetime usufruct to a child. The child is entitled to civil fruits (rentals) during the usufruct (Civil Code of the Philippines, 1949, Articles 566 and 569), while the parent retains ownership and may alienate the property provided the usufruct is not prejudiced (Civil Code of the Philippines, 1949, Article 581).

Scenario 2: Corporation retains ownership, officer/founder is given residential use. A corporation grants officers a usufruct for residential occupation with clear limits (no business use, no leasing). This can align with the concept that usufruct is enjoyment without transferring ownership (Civil Code of the Philippines, 1949, Article 562).

Scenario 3: Co-owned property, one co-owner grants usufruct over his share. The usufruct may affect administration and collection of fruits with respect to that share; if co-ownership ends by division, the usufruct attaches to the portion allotted (Civil Code of the Philippines, 1949, Article 582). Disputes often arise over who may stay; clear “full control and possession” language helps, as shown in Fernandez, et al. v. Fernandez (2024).

Registration and annotation on the title: why it matters

For real property—especially registered land—parties commonly seek annotation of the usufruct on the certificate of title to place third parties on notice and avoid later disputes with buyers, mortgagees, or heirs. While the Civil Code defines the rights and obligations, annotation is often demanded in transactions as a risk-management step.

Tax and BIR considerations: whether a contract of usufruct is a “sale”

A recurring concern is whether granting usufruct triggers capital gains tax (CGT) or constitutes a transfer of ownership requiring tax clearance for title annotation. In BIR Ruling No. 810-2018 (2018), the BIR stated that a contract of usufruct does not involve transfer, conveyance, or disposition of ownership and is not a sale or transfer of real property, emphasizing that the owner retains ownership and even reserves the right to sell or encumber the property subject to recognition of the usufruct.

For estate tax contexts, the NIRC recognizes valuation rules for usufruct, use, or habitation in determining estate value (National Internal Revenue Code of 1997, as updated, Section 88[A]) and also lists certain exempt transmissions, including the merger of usufruct in the owner of the naked title (National Internal Revenue Code of 1997, as updated, Section 87[A]).

Reminder: Tax outcomes are fact-sensitive (e.g., whether there is consideration, whether the usufruct is tied to a donation or succession arrangement). When large assets are involved, parties typically request a tailored review before execution and annotation.

How usufruct ends and what happens after termination

The Civil Code lists multiple causes of extinguishment, including:

• Death of the usufructuary (unless a contrary intention clearly appears)
• Expiration of the period or fulfillment of a resolutory condition in the title
• Merger of usufruct and ownership in the same person
• Renunciation
• Total loss of the thing
• Termination of the right of the person constituting the usufruct
• Prescription

These grounds are provided in the Civil Code of the Philippines (1949, Article 603). Upon termination, the property must be delivered to the owner, subject to the usufructuary’s limited rights of retention for reimbursable taxes and extraordinary expenses (Civil Code of the Philippines, 1949, Article 612).

Enforcement and dispute issues: possession, tolerance, and ejectment

Usufruct disputes often arise when family members or co-owners remain on the land despite a grant of enjoyment to the usufructuary. The Supreme Court in Fernandez, et al. v. Fernandez (2024) treated continued stay by a co-owner as mere tolerance where the usufructuary had been granted “full control and possession,” and recognized that upon a valid demand to vacate, possession could become illegal and support unlawful detainer filed within the proper period.

Another recurring issue is when the usufruct instrument includes conditions about behavior or relationship. In Moralidad v. Pernes (2006), the Court recognized that a usufruct may be extinguished based on resolutory conditionsexpressly stated in the title creating it.

Common drafting and planning mistakes to avoid

• Unclear scope of possession (exclusive vs. shared). Ambiguity fuels co-owner disputes; courts infer intent from the language used, such as “full control and possession” (Fernandez, et al. v. Fernandez, 2024).
• No rules on fruits and leasing. If leasing is intended, specify who signs, who collects, and who pays expenses (Civil Code of the Philippines, 1949, Articles 566 and 569).
• No termination triggers or remedies. If you want termination for breach or conflict, spell out resolutory conditions consistent with Moralidad v. Pernes (2006) and Civil Code rules on extinguishment (Civil Code of the Philippines, 1949, Article 603).
• Ignoring inventory/security rules. The default rule requires inventory and security before enjoyment, unless excused (Civil Code of the Philippines, 1949, Articles 583 and 585).
• Failure to coordinate registration and tax documentation. Where annotation is desired, transaction papers should be consistent with the non-transfer nature of usufruct as discussed in BIR Ruling No. 810-2018 (2018).

Final observations and recommendations

A usufruct agreement is a powerful tool to keep land ownership while granting another party legally recognized use, possession, and entitlement to fruits. To reduce disputes, the agreement should clearly define possession rights, permitted uses, fruits and income handling, expense allocation, inventory/security compliance, and termination events consistent with the Civil Code (1949, Articles 562–612) and jurisprudence such as Fernandez, et al. v. Fernandez(2024) and Moralidad v. Pernes (2006).

For high-value property or family estate arrangements, it is advisable to have the document reviewed alongside succession and tax planning, including how annotation and supporting BIR requirements will be addressed, consistent with BIR Ruling No. 810-2018 (2018) and relevant NIRC provisions on usufruct valuation and exempt transmissions (National Internal Revenue Code of 1997, as updated, Sections 87 and 88).

About Nicolas and De Vega Law Offices

 Nicolas and de Vega Law Offices is a full-service law firm in the Philippines.  You may visit us at the 16th Flr., Suite 1607 AIC Burgundy Empire Tower, ADB Ave., Ortigas Center, 1605 Pasig City, Metro Manila, Philippines.  You may also call us at +632 84706126, +632 84706130, +632 84016392 or e-mail us at [email protected]. Visit our website https://ndvlaw.com.