Job Offer and Employment

This article examines the legal implications of job offers in Philippine labor law, particularly the point at which an employment contract is deemed perfected.

In labor relations, the transition from job offer to employment contract is a critical juncture. While a job offer alone does not automatically create an employer-employee relationship, the Supreme Court has consistently held that once the parties agree on the essential terms—such as position, compensation, and start date—the contract is perfected. This principle ensures that workers are protected even before they physically report for duty.

Thus, in Aragones v. Alltech Biotechnology Corporation (G.R. No. 251736, 02 April 2025), the Supreme Court ruled that an employment contract was perfected when the applicant signed and returned the offer letter, which included a specific start date and probationary terms. In this case, after the job offer was signed and accepted bv the employee, the company later rescinded the offer based on redundancy. The Supreme Court held that the contract was valid and binding from the moment of acceptance. The stipulated start date merely fixed when the obligations would become enforceable—not when the contract was formed. Thus, it ruled:

“A contract is perfected upon the concurrence of the following requisites: (1) the consent of the contracting parties; (2) an object certain, which is the subject matter of the contract; and (3) the cause of the obligation. “Consent” is manifested by the meeting of the offer and the acceptance upon the thing and the cause which are to constitute the contract. For consent to be valid, the “offer” must be certain, and the “acceptance” must be absolute. A contract is deemed perfected from the time the acceptance is made known to the offeror.32 Without the offeror’s knowledge of the acceptance, there is no meeting of the minds of the parties, and thus, no real concurrence of offer and acceptance.

An employment contract, like any other contract, is perfected at the moment the parties come to agree upon its terms and conditions, and thereafter, concur in the essential elements thereof.

Based on these requirements, the Court finds that an employment contract between Aragones and Alltech was perfected on April 18, 2016. This conclusion is supported by the following undisputed facts: (a) Alltech made an offer that is certain through the Job Offer; (b) Aragones unequivocally accepted this offer by affixing his signature thereon on April 18, 2016; and (c) he informed Alltech of his acceptance by sending a copy of the signed Job Offer to respondent Octavio Eckhardt (Eckhardt) via e-mail on the same day. Thus, Alltech cannot claim that it validly withdrew its job offer in view of the general rule that an offer, once accepted, cannot be withdrawn.”

Furthermore, it was held that it is possible that the perfection of the employment contract and the commencement of the employment relationship may not coincide. The Supreme Court enunciated:

“Here, the July 1, 2016 commencement date agreed upon by the parties is a suspensive period that merely deferred the demandability of their respective obligations as employer and employee—namely, the employee’s obligation to render services and the employer’s obligation to pay wages. It did not affect the existence or birth of those obligations. In other words, while the employer-employee relationship was already established when the contract was entered into on April 18, 2016, the demandability of their respective obligations as employer and employee was deferred until July 1, 2016. That the demandability of obligations was at a later time (July 1, 2016), while the contract was established earlier (April 18, 2016), is a result of the fact that Aragones had yet to wrap up his employment with Cargill. It was a period where Aragones can voluntarily terminate his employment with Cargill and do a proper turn-over. This is a recognition that most employees who shift from one employer to another would usually wait for an offer from a new employer before voluntarily terminating their current employment, which was the case here. Aragones, after having obtained an offer from Alltech, accepted the same, and was given a sufficient period between April 18, 2016 to July 1, 2016 to wrap up his employment with Cargill. Alltech, on the other hand, can use the period to prepare for the position of Aragones, such as making sure he has all the necessary equipment to do his work. This period benefits both Alltech and Aragones.

Even the requirement that Aragones sign an employment contract on his first day of work did not prevent this. After all, no particular form of contract or document is required to prove the existence of an employer-­employee relationship.”

The Aragones Case sends a clear message that once a job offer is accepted, the employer cannot arbitrarily withdraw it without legal consequences. The perfection of the employment contract triggers obligations, including the duty to honor the agreed terms or face liability for illegal dismissal.

Employers must exercise caution and good faith when issuing job offers, ensuring that any withdrawal is legally justified and supported by evidence. Employees, on the other hand, are assured that their rights begin not at the first day of work, but at the moment of acceptance.

About Nicolas and De Vega Law Offices

Nicolas and de Vega Law Offices is a full-service law firm in the Philippines.  You may visit us at the 16th Flr., Suite 1607 AIC Burgundy Empire Tower, ADB Ave., Ortigas Center, 1605 Pasig City, Metro Manila, Philippines.  You may also call us at +632 84706126, +632 84706130, +632 84016392 or e-mail us at [email protected]. Visit our website https://ndvlaw.com.