How Is Business Goodwill Valued After Partnership Dissolution?
Introduction
When business partners separate, the partnership’s physical assets are usually easier to identify and value than its goodwill. Goodwill may arise from the firm’s reputation, established client relationships, location, trade name, systems, and ability to earn profits beyond the return normally produced by its tangible assets.
Under Philippine partnership law, goodwill may affect the amount payable to a retiring or departing partner. Its treatment, however, depends on the cause of dissolution, the partnership agreement, the continued use of the business, and the evidence proving that the goodwill has monetary value.
What Is Goodwill?
Goodwill is an intangible business asset associated with the ability of an enterprise to generate economic benefits beyond the value of its identifiable assets. It may reflect customer patronage, business reputation, favorable location, established systems, brand recognition, and expected future earnings.
The Supreme Court has described goodwill as inseparable from the business to which it adds value. It generally cannot be transferred independently from the business itself. This principle was discussed in Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Hongkong Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited – Philippine Branch, G.R. No. 227121, 29 June 2020.
Goodwill should therefore not be treated automatically as a separate item that can be sold or distributed apart from the enterprise. Its value ordinarily appears in the value of the business as a whole, although the parties or an appraisal may separately identify it for accounting and settlement purposes.
Governing Partnership Rules
The Civil Code distinguishes dissolution from termination. Dissolution changes the relationship among the partners, but the partnership continues for purposes of winding up until its affairs have been completed.
Under Article 1837 of the Civil Code of the Philippines, when dissolution is caused in contravention of the partnership agreement, the partner who caused the wrongful dissolution may be liable for damages. If the other partners continue the business, the wrongful dissolving partner may generally receive the value of the partner’s interest, less the damage caused by the dissolution.
In that situation, Article 1837 expressly provides that the value of the goodwill of the business shall not be considered in determining the interest of the partner who caused the wrongful dissolution when the remaining partners continue the business.
By contrast, Article 1841 of the Civil Code provides that when the business continues after the retirement or death of a partner, without settlement of accounts, the retiring partner or the legal representative of the deceased partner may have the value of the interest at the date of dissolution ascertained and may receive the amount as an ordinary creditor, subject to the statutory rules on priority.
When May Goodwill Be Included?
Goodwill may be included in the valuation when the partnership agreement, the parties’ conduct, or the circumstances of the dissolution support its recognition. The valuation must be based on evidence showing that the goodwill represents a real economic benefit of the partnership rather than merely the personal reputation of an individual partner.
In Sunga-Chan, et al. v. Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No. 164401, 15 August 2008, the Supreme Court sustained the valuation of goodwill because the parties had made judicial admissions regarding its monetary value. The Court also upheld the valuation of partnership profits and assets because the record contained accounting reports and valuation evidence supporting those amounts.
The case demonstrates that goodwill can form part of a partner’s financial settlement when its value is established with reasonable certainty. A valuation should not rest solely on an unsupported estimate or a partner’s personal belief concerning the worth of the firm.
When Is Goodwill Excluded?
Goodwill may be excluded in at least three common situations:
- Wrongful dissolution followed by continuation. Article 1837 excludes the value of goodwill when the partner wrongfully caused dissolution and the other partners continue the business.
- Personal professional reputation. The alleged goodwill may belong to the individual partner rather than to the partnership, particularly where clients retain the partner because of personal skill, trust, or professional standing.
- Insufficient proof. Goodwill should not be assigned a monetary amount without reliable financial, operational, or market evidence.
In Salazar, et al. v. Romulo, et al., G.R. No. 19236, 31 July 1979, the Supreme Court distinguished ordinary commercial partnerships from law partnerships. It recognized that the reputation of a professional partnership may depend on the individual skill of its members and that the personal nature of legal services makes the treatment of goodwill different from that of a commercial enterprise.
How Is Goodwill Computed?
Philippine partnership law does not prescribe one mandatory mathematical formula for valuing goodwill. The appropriate method depends on the nature of the business, the partnership agreement, available financial records, and the reason for the valuation.
Common valuation approaches include the following:
| Approach | General Method |
|---|---|
| Excess earnings method | Estimates the firm’s earnings above a normal return on its identifiable tangible and intangible assets, then capitalizes the excess. |
| Capitalization of earnings | Capitalizes maintainable historical or projected earnings using a rate that reflects business and financial risk. |
| Income approach | Discounts expected future cash flows attributable to the business, including recurring customer relationships and reputation. |
| Market approach | Uses comparable business sales or industry multiples, when reliable comparison data are available. |
| Asset-based approach | Values identifiable assets and liabilities, with goodwill appearing as the residual amount when justified by the total business value. |
The selected method should be consistently applied and supported by financial records. The valuation should also distinguish goodwill from identifiable intangible assets such as trademarks, trade names, proprietary systems, client contracts, and intellectual property.
Information Needed for the Valuation
A defensible goodwill valuation ordinarily requires the following information:
- Partnership agreements and amendments;
- Financial statements and tax filings for several years;
- Revenue, profit, and cash-flow records;
- Customer retention and concentration data;
- Existing contracts and recurring engagements;
- Details of the firm’s trade name, location, systems, and workforce;
- Evidence of comparable business transactions; and
- Information concerning the partner’s personal contribution to client relationships and earnings.
The valuation date must also be identified. Depending on the governing agreement and the applicable Civil Code provision, the relevant date may be the date of dissolution, retirement, death, or another date agreed upon by the partners or fixed by the court.
Accounting for Partnership Assets and Losses
Goodwill cannot be valued in isolation from the partnership’s other assets and liabilities. The partnership’s capital accounts must be adjusted for profits, losses, depreciation, amortization, unpaid obligations, contingent liabilities, and changes in asset values.
In Villareal, et al. v. Ramirez, et al., G.R. No. 144214, 13 February 2003, the Supreme Court explained that partnership capital changes according to the gains and losses of the business. A partner’s contribution is not automatically a loan repayable in full upon withdrawal or dissolution.
The Court also emphasized the importance of considering items such as depreciation, equipment amortization, and goodwill-related adjustments in determining whether the partnership has actually earned profits or suffered losses. The amount ultimately payable to a partner is therefore based on the properly adjusted net value of the partnership, not simply on the original capital contribution.
Procedure During Winding Up
After dissolution, the partnership’s affairs should be wound up before the partners’ final interests are distributed. The usual sequence is:
- Confirm the legal and contractual cause of dissolution.
- Determine whether the business will be liquidated or continued by some partners.
- Inventory and value the partnership’s assets, including any goodwill properly belonging to the firm.
- Identify and pay or provide for partnership liabilities.
- Adjust the partners’ capital and current accounts for profits, losses, withdrawals, and advances.
- Compute the departing partner’s net interest under the partnership agreement and the Civil Code.
- Distribute the remaining assets or secure payment as required.
The remaining partners should not unilaterally determine the departing partner’s share without an accounting. In Primelink Properties and Development Corporation, et al. v. Lazatin, et al., G.R. No. 167379, 15 February 2006, the Supreme Court held that the settlement of partnership accounts, including claims relating to improvements and advances, must be resolved during the winding-up process.
Effect of Continuing the Business
If some partners continue the enterprise, the valuation must determine what portion of the business belongs to the departing partner as of the applicable valuation date. The continuing partners may assume the business, but they must account for the departing partner’s lawful interest and comply with any bond, payment, indemnity, or other requirement imposed by the partnership agreement or the Civil Code.
Where the departing partner caused dissolution wrongfully and the remaining partners continue the business under Article 1837, the partner’s interest is reduced by damages and goodwill is excluded from the computation. This rule prevents a partner who breached the partnership arrangement from demanding a share in the enhanced reputation and continuing patronage retained by the partners who preserved the enterprise.
Professional Partnerships Require Separate Analysis
Goodwill in a professional partnership requires particular care. A medical, legal, accounting, or consulting practice may have firm-level goodwill, but much of its earning capacity may also arise from the personal skill, license, relationships, and reputation of individual professionals.
The valuation should therefore identify whether clients are attached to the firm as an institution or primarily to a particular partner. A client list should not automatically be assigned a monetary value, especially where transferring clients would be legally restricted, commercially uncertain, or inconsistent with the confidential and personal nature of the professional relationship.
Role of Appraisal and Valuation Reports
A valuation report should identify the assumptions, financial periods, valuation date, method, discount or capitalization rate, treatment of liabilities, and adjustments for unusual or nonrecurring earnings. It should also explain whether the reported goodwill is internally generated, acquired, contractual, or attributable primarily to an individual partner.
SEC Memorandum Circular No. 2, Series of 2014, concerns asset valuation guidelines for registered corporations imbued with public interest and certain entities subject to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s regulatory requirements. It defines assets to include intangible assets and recognizes appraisal companies and professional services organizations as valuation providers.
Its applicability depends on the status of the partnership and the transaction involved. It should not be treated as a universal formula governing every private partnership dissolution. Parties should first determine whether the partnership falls within the issuance’s regulatory coverage.
Typical Examples
Example 1: Commercial enterprise. A retail partnership has stable recurring customers, a valuable location, recognizable branding, and earnings substantially above the return expected from its equipment and inventory. These facts may support a firm-level goodwill valuation, subject to reliable financial evidence.
Example 2: Wrongful withdrawal. A partner leaves in violation of a fixed-term partnership agreement, and the remaining partners continue the business. If the dissolution is wrongful, Article 1837 may permit the remaining partners to recover damages, while excluding goodwill in computing the wrongful partner’s interest.
Example 3: Professional practice. A consulting partnership’s revenue is generated almost entirely by one partner’s personal expertise and client relationships. The alleged goodwill may be limited because the earning capacity may not remain with the firm after that partner’s departure.
Recommended Documents and Safeguards
Partners should address goodwill expressly in the partnership agreement. The agreement may specify whether goodwill is recognized, the valuation date, the valuation method, the appraiser’s qualifications, treatment of client relationships, payment terms, dispute procedures, and the consequences of wrongful dissolution.
During dissolution, the partners should preserve financial records, avoid transferring partnership assets without authority, document client and contract information, and obtain an independent valuation where the amount is substantial or disputed.
Any settlement should be supported by a complete accounting showing gross assets, liabilities, adjustments, goodwill, each partner’s capital account, damages if applicable, and the final amount payable.
Conclusion
Business goodwill may form part of a partner’s interest during dissolution, but it is not automatically payable or separately transferable. Its inclusion depends on the partnership agreement, the nature of the business, the cause of dissolution, the continuation of the enterprise, and proof that the goodwill belongs to the partnership rather than solely to an individual partner.
The soundest approach is to conduct a full winding-up and accounting, use a valuation method suited to the business, adjust the partnership’s assets and liabilities, and apply Article 1837 or Article 1841 of the Civil Code as the circumstances require. Partners should obtain professional valuation and legal advice before distributing assets or signing a final settlement.
About Nicolas and De Vega Law Offices
Nicolas and de Vega Law Offices is a full-service law firm in the Philippines. You may visit us at the 16th Flr., Suite 1607 AIC Burgundy Empire Tower, ADB Ave., Ortigas Center, 1605 Pasig City, Metro Manila, Philippines. You may also call us at +632 84706126, +632 84706130, +632 84016392 or e-mail us at [email protected]. Visit our website https://ndvlaw.com.
