How Can Co-Heirs Force Sale of Undivided Property?

Introduction

When siblings inherit a commercial building as co-heirs, each may wish to sell the property and distribute the proceeds. Problems arise when one or more co-heirs refuse to sell, sign a partition agreement, or cooperate in transferring the property.

Under Philippine law, however, a co-heir generally cannot be compelled to remain indefinitely in co-ownership. The proper remedy is an action for partition. Depending on the nature of the property and the parties’ positions, the court may order physical division, assign the property to one co-owner who pays the others, or direct its sale at public auction.

What Is Co-Ownership Among Co-Heirs?

Co-ownership exists when an undivided property belongs to two or more persons. In an inherited estate, co-heirs may hold ideal or proportionate shares in the entire property before partition, rather than ownership of specific rooms, floors, or portions of the building.

A co-heir may generally transfer or sell his or her undivided hereditary rights. That transfer does not, however, give the buyer ownership of a particular physical portion of the commercial building before partition.

In Salvador, et al. v. Salvador, et al., G.R. No. 234681, 2024, the Supreme Court explained that a co-owner may dispose only of an undivided aliquot share, limited to the portion that may eventually be allotted to that co-owner upon partition. Before partition, a co-heir may sell successional rights but cannot validly adjudicate to himself or herself a definite part of the property.

Can a Co-Heir Demand Partition?

Yes. Article 1083 of the Civil Code provides that every co-heir has the right to demand division of the estate, subject to limited restrictions. A testator may prohibit partition, but the period of indivision generally cannot exceed twenty years.

Article 494 of the Civil Code likewise provides that no co-owner may be required to remain in co-ownership. Each co-owner may demand partition of the property at any time, insofar as his or her share is concerned.

The right to demand partition may be limited when partition is prohibited by law, when a valid agreement maintains the property undivided for a permitted period, or when a testator has imposed a valid temporary prohibition. These restrictions do not ordinarily authorize permanent forced co-ownership.

What Is the Proper Court Action?

The usual remedy is a special civil action for partition under Rule 69 of the Rules of Court. The complaint must state:

• the nature and extent of the plaintiff’s title or interest;
• an adequate description of the commercial building and the land on which it stands;
• the plaintiff’s relationship to the deceased owner and basis for succession; and
• the names and interests of all other persons who claim rights in the property.

Rule 69, Section 1 of the 2019 Amendments to the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure requires the plaintiff to join as defendants all other persons interested in the real estate.

The action may seek judicial partition even when some co-heirs refuse to sign a settlement, decline to sell, or oppose the proposed division.

Who Must Be Joined in the Case?

All co-heirs and other persons with a legal interest in the property should be impleaded. This may include surviving heirs, heirs of a deceased co-heir, transferees of hereditary rights, registered co-owners, and persons claiming an interest under an earlier conveyance or court order.

In Divinagracia v. Parilla, et al., G.R. No. 196750, 2015, the Supreme Court held that persons having an interest in the property are indispensable parties in a partition case. A judgment rendered without necessary indispensable parties may be ineffective as to them.

Non-joinder does not ordinarily require outright dismissal. The proper course is generally to direct the inclusion of the indispensable parties and proceed with the case after the defect is corrected.

What Happens After Filing the Complaint?

Partition cases generally proceed in two stages. The first stage determines whether the plaintiff has the right to demand partition and identifies the parties’ respective interests. The second stage determines how the property will be divided or disposed of.

The court may initially determine matters such as:

• whether the plaintiff is a co-heir or co-owner;
• whether the property forms part of the estate;
• which persons are entitled to shares;
• whether any valid restriction on partition exists; and
• whether the property is subject to a mortgage, lease, agrarian restriction, or other encumbrance.

If the right to partition is established, the court may appoint commissioners to examine the property, determine whether physical division is possible, assess the parties’ shares, and submit a report.

Can the Court Order a Physical Division of the Building?

Physical partition is possible when the commercial building and the land can be divided without violating law, impairing the property’s usefulness, or unfairly prejudicing the co-heirs.

For example, physical division may be feasible where the property consists of separate commercial units with independent entrances, utilities, and legally separable areas. The court must still consider zoning rules, building regulations, title requirements, access, and the economic effect of the proposed division.

Article 495 of the Civil Code limits physical division when it would render the property unserviceable for its intended use. A commercial building may therefore be unsuitable for physical partition if division would destroy its structural integrity, eliminate necessary access, reduce its income-producing function, or make the resulting portions unusable.

When May the Property Be Assigned to One Co-Heir?

If the property cannot be physically divided without prejudice to the parties, the court may assign it to one co-heir who is willing to take it and pay the other co-heirs the amounts determined to be equitable.

Rule 69, Section 5 of the Rules of Court recognizes this remedy. The amount payable should reflect the value of each co-heir’s share, subject to valid deductions or adjustments for liens, expenses, taxes, improvements, and other legally relevant matters.

This option may be suitable where one sibling wishes to retain and operate the commercial building, while the other siblings prefer to receive the value of their hereditary shares.

When May the Court Order a Public Auction?

A public auction may be ordered when physical division is not suitable and one of the interested parties asks that the property be sold instead of assigned to a co-heir.

Under Rule 69, Section 5, the commissioners may be directed to sell the property at public sale under conditions and within a period fixed by the court. The sale proceeds are then distributed according to the parties’ adjudicated shares, after payment of lawful expenses, liens, and other obligations.

The auction is not the same as an informal private sale. It is conducted under judicial supervision and according to the court’s order. The court may set conditions concerning the property’s valuation, publication, bidding, deposit, confirmation, and distribution of proceeds.

In Marasigan, et al. v. Marasigan, et al., G.R. No. 156078, 2008, the Supreme Court recognized assignment to one co-owner or sale at public auction when physical division would prejudice the parties’ interests. The decision also explained that these remedies must be read together with Articles 494 and 495 of the Civil Code.

What If One Co-Heir Refuses to Sign a Sale Agreement?

A co-heir’s refusal to sign a private deed of sale does not ordinarily defeat the right to seek partition. The plaintiff does not need the opposing co-heir’s consent to commence the judicial proceeding.

The court cannot simply compel a co-heir to execute an ordinary private sale when the co-heir does not agree to sell. Instead, the court may grant the statutory remedy of partition and, where appropriate, assignment or judicial sale.

If a co-heir previously signed a partition or sale agreement, the court will generally examine whether the document was validly executed, whether the parties acted upon it, and whether the co-heir later acquiesced in or ratified it.

In Silva v. Lo, G.R. No. 206667, 2021, the Supreme Court held that a final order of partition, once confirmed by the court and no longer timely appealed, generally cannot be collaterally attacked through certiorari. The Court also recognized that the absence of one co-heir’s signature does not necessarily invalidate a partition where acquiescence or ratification is established.

What Evidence Should the Plaintiff Prepare?

A co-heir seeking partition should gather documents proving both the property and the hereditary relationship. Commonly useful evidence includes:

• the title or certified copy of the tax declaration;
• the deceased owner’s death certificate;
• the will, if any;
• birth, marriage, and death records establishing the heirs;
• previous deeds of sale, settlement, partition, or assignment;
• property tax receipts and records of expenses;
• leases, permits, and income records for the commercial building;
• mortgage, lien, or encumbrance documents; and
• appraisals, surveys, building plans, and photographs.

The complaint should clearly identify each co-heir’s estimated share while recognizing that the final shares may depend on proof of filiation, representation, legitimacy, donations, debts, and other succession issues.

What If the Estate Has Not Yet Been Settled?

If the estate remains unsettled, the parties may need to address estate settlement before or together with the determination of the heirs’ shares. The proper proceeding may depend on whether there is a will, whether the heirs agree, whether creditors exist, and whether the estate includes disputed assets or claims.

An extrajudicial settlement is generally available only when its statutory requirements are met, including agreement among the heirs and compliance with publication and registration requirements. If one or more heirs refuse to cooperate or a dispute exists, judicial settlement may be necessary.

A partition case should not assume that the plaintiff owns a particular floor, store, or room unless that portion has already been validly adjudicated by agreement or judicial decree.

What If the Building Produces Rental Income?

Rental income and other fruits of co-owned property generally belong to the co-owners in proportion to their respective shares, subject to accounting for expenses, taxes, repairs, insurance, and necessary preservation costs.

A co-heir who exclusively collects rent or occupies the building may be required to account for the benefits received, particularly after a demand for accounting or partition. The court may also consider whether one party paid expenses that benefited the entire property.

The complaint may include appropriate claims for accounting, distribution of income, reimbursement, or damages when supported by the facts. These claims should be pleaded carefully because partition is a special civil action and may involve distinct procedural requirements.

Can a Co-Heir Sell His Share to an Outsider?

Generally, a co-heir may transfer an undivided hereditary share or successional rights, subject to legal restrictions and the rights of the other co-heirs. The buyer acquires the transferor’s rights, but does not automatically obtain a specific physical portion of the commercial building.

The transfer may also be affected by the right of redemption among co-owners under the Civil Code, depending on the circumstances and the terms of the sale. The parties should examine the deed, the timing of the sale, the notice given, and the applicable statutory requirements.

Registration of a deed does not by itself convert an undivided share into a determinate portion of the property. A separate partition agreement or judicial decree may still be necessary.

What Practical Steps Should a Co-Heir Take?

1. Confirm the ownership record. Obtain a certified title, tax declaration, survey plan, and records of liens or mortgages.
2. Identify all heirs and claimants. Verify the family relationships and determine whether any heir has died, renounced, assigned, or sold hereditary rights.
3. Send a written demand. Propose partition, assignment to one co-heir, or sale of the property, and request an accounting of income and expenses.
4. Obtain an independent valuation. A reliable appraisal can assist negotiations and help the court evaluate assignment or sale.
5. File a partition action when negotiations fail. Join every person with a legal interest and attach the principal ownership and succession documents.
6. Preserve the property. Request appropriate relief if there is a risk of unauthorized sale, waste, concealment of rental income, or deterioration of the building.

Illustrative Example

Assume that three siblings inherit a commercial building. Two want to sell it, but the third refuses to sign any deed because the third sibling operates a business on the ground floor.

The two siblings may file an action for partition. If the building cannot be divided without impairing its use, the court may assign it to the operating sibling upon payment of the other siblings’ shares. If that sibling cannot or will not pay, and an interested party requests a sale, the court may order a public auction and distribute the net proceeds according to the adjudicated ownership interests.

The operating sibling’s refusal to sign a private sale does not permanently prevent the termination of co-ownership.

Important Limitations

Partition may be affected by a valid prohibition in a will, a lawful agreement to maintain co-ownership for a limited period, a mortgage, a lease, a court order, or other statutory restrictions. The court must also account for the rights of creditors, tenants, government agencies, and persons with registered interests.

If the property is agricultural land covered by agrarian reform laws, additional requirements and restrictions may apply. The rules applicable to agricultural land should not automatically be applied to an ordinary commercial building outside agrarian reform coverage.

Conclusion

A co-heir generally cannot be forced to sign a voluntary private sale, but the co-heir also cannot ordinarily compel the others to remain in co-ownership indefinitely. The appropriate judicial remedy is an action for partition under Rule 69 of the Rules of Court and Articles 494, 495, 496, 498, and 1083 of the Civil Code.

Depending on the evidence and the property’s condition, the court may order physical division, assign the building to one co-heir who pays the others, or direct a public auction. Before filing, the claimant should verify the title, establish the complete list of heirs, obtain a valuation, account for rental income and expenses, and include every person with a legal interest in the property.

About Nicolas and De Vega Law Offices

 Nicolas and de Vega Law Offices is a full-service law firm in the Philippines.  You may visit us at the 16th Flr., Suite 1607 AIC Burgundy Empire Tower, ADB Ave., Ortigas Center, 1605 Pasig City, Metro Manila, Philippines.  You may also call us at +632 84706126, +632 84706130, +632 84016392 or e-mail us at [email protected]. Visit our website https://ndvlaw.com.