Can Children Reduce Excessive Spousal Donations?

Introduction

Donations made by one spouse to the other during marriage may affect the inheritance ultimately received by the couple’s children. Although spouses generally have the power to dispose of property, that power is limited by the legitime reserved by law for compulsory heirs.

Children may therefore seek the reduction of donations that exceed the portion the donor could have freely given by will. The result depends on the nature of the property, the timing and form of the donation, the donor’s estate at death, and whether the transfer impaired the legitime of compulsory heirs.

What Is a Child’s Legitime?

A legitime is the portion of the hereditary estate that the law reserves for compulsory heirs. Legitimate children and descendants are compulsory heirs, and their legitime generally consists of one-half of the hereditary estate of their parent or ascendant. The remaining half is ordinarily the disposable portion, subject to the rights of the surviving spouse and illegitimate children (Civil Code, Art. 888).

The donor cannot deprive compulsory heirs of their legitime except in cases expressly allowed by law. The donor also cannot burden the legitime with a condition, encumbrance, or substitution (Civil Code, Art. 904).

When a testamentary disposition impairs a child’s legitime, the child may petition for its reduction to the extent that it is excessive or inofficious (Civil Code, Art. 907).

How Do Spousal Donations Affect Children’s Inheritance?

A donation between spouses is made during the donor’s lifetime, but its value may still be relevant when determining whether the donor’s compulsory heirs received their lawful shares. A person may not donate more than he or she could give by will. Any excess is inofficious and may be reduced (Civil Code, Art. 752).

Donations to children are generally charged to the recipient child’s legitime. Donations to strangers are charged to the portion of the estate that the donor could freely dispose of by will. If the donation exceeds the disposable portion, it may be reduced under the Civil Code (Civil Code, Art. 909).

A donation to a spouse is ordinarily treated as a donation to a person other than the donor’s child. Its value may therefore be charged against the donor’s disposable portion, subject to the rights of the donor’s compulsory heirs.

The Supreme Court has recognized that the donor’s power to dispose of property mortis causa is limited by the legitime reserved for forced heirs. Testamentary dispositions that do not impair the legitime are generally valid, while excessive dispositions may be reduced upon proper petition ( Josefa A. Vda. De Claudio, et al. v. Aragon, et al., G.R. No. 2920, 1951).

When May a Donation Between Spouses Be Reduced?

A donation between spouses may be reduced when the following circumstances are present:

• The donor dies and succession rights become demandable;
• The donor leaves compulsory heirs, such as legitimate children;
• The value of the donation, together with other donations and testamentary dispositions, exceeds the donor’s disposable portion; and
• The excess impairs the legitime of the compulsory heirs.

The assessment is not based solely on the property’s value when it was donated. The relevant inquiry is whether, after considering the donor’s estate and legally relevant donations, the compulsory heirs received the shares reserved to them by law.

A donation may remain valid as to the disposable portion while being reduced only insofar as it exceeds that portion. Reduction does not necessarily invalidate the entire transfer.

What Is the Effect of Article 134?

The Civil Code contains a specific rule on certain donations made during marriage. Donations by one spouse to the children whom the other spouse had by another marriage, or to persons of whom the other spouse is a presumptive heir at the time of the donation, are voidable at the instance of the donor’s heirs after the donor’s death (Civil Code, Art. 134).

This provision is narrower than the general rules on impairment of legitime. It applies to the relationships specifically described by the law and gives the donor’s heirs a basis to challenge the donation after the donor’s death.

Accordingly, a donation between spouses should not be analyzed under Article 134 alone. Counsel should also examine the rules on the disposable portion, legitime, collation, reduction, and the prohibition against impairing compulsory heirs’ shares.

Must the Donation Be Included in Computing the Estate?

Donations made during the donor’s lifetime may have to be considered in determining whether the compulsory heirs received their legitimes. Every compulsory heir who succeeds with other compulsory heirs must generally bring into the mass of the estate property or rights received from the decedent by donation or another gratuitous title, so that the legitimes and the partition can be computed (Civil Code, Art. 1061).

The Supreme Court has held that a probate court may provisionally determine questions of collation or advancement for purposes of preparing the estate inventory, without preventing a final determination in an appropriate separate action ( Gregorio, et al. v. Madarang, et al., G.R. No. 185226, 2010).

Although Article 1061 directly concerns compulsory heirs who received gratuitous transfers, the broader question remains whether the donation to the surviving spouse must be accounted for in determining the donor’s net estate, disposable portion, and the children’s legitimes. The answer depends on the nature of the transfer, the applicable property regime, and the precise relief sought.

Can a Donation to the Spouse Be Challenged Even If the Property Is No Longer in the Estate?

Yes, potentially. The fact that the donated property is no longer owned by the decedent at death does not automatically prevent an inquiry into whether the donation impaired the legitime of compulsory heirs.

The Supreme Court has recognized that an inter vivos donation may be subject to collation or reduction when it impairs the legitime of compulsory heirs, even if the donated property is no longer part of the estate at the time of death ( Lucerna v. Branch XLIII of the Regional Trial Court of Negros Occidental, et al., G.R. No. 65800, 1986).

The court must nevertheless determine the property’s relevant value, the donor’s entire estate, the donor’s other gratuitous transfers, and the shares legally reserved for each compulsory heir.

How Are Donations and Testamentary Dispositions Prioritized?

Where several donations exist and the disposable portion is insufficient to cover all of them, donations of the more recent date are suppressed or reduced with respect to the excess (Civil Code, Art. 773).

This rule may become important where a donor made several transfers to a spouse, children, relatives, or third parties. The date and nature of every donation should be established before determining which transfer must bear the reduction.

Testamentary dispositions that impair the legitime are reduced upon petition of the compulsory heirs. A child who believes that a spousal donation caused an impairment should therefore identify the precise shortfall and not merely allege that the donation was unfair or disproportionate.

What If the Transfer Was a Donation Mortis Causa?

A donation mortis causa takes effect only upon the donor’s death and is governed by the formalities applicable to wills. If the transfer is testamentary in substance, the instrument must be examined for compliance with the law on wills and succession.

The Supreme Court has ruled that a donation mortis causa remains subject to reduction when it impairs the legitime of compulsory heirs. In one case, a donation of several properties had to be reduced because it exceeded the portion that the decedent could freely dispose of ( Heirs of Estella, et al. v. Estella, et al., G.R. No. 245469, 2020).

The label placed on the document is not decisive. The instrument’s terms, the time when ownership is intended to pass, and the donor’s retained rights must be examined.

Illustrative Example

Assume that a parent dies leaving one legitimate child and a surviving spouse. The parent previously donated valuable property to the spouse and later left the remainder of the estate to the spouse by will.

The child may ask whether the combined effect of the donation and the testamentary disposition left the child with less than the legitime required by law. If the child’s legitime was impaired, the excessive portion may be reduced. The spouse may retain the amount that can validly be charged against the disposable portion, but not the amount that unlawfully diminishes the child’s reserved share.

The calculation cannot be made from the donated property alone. It requires an inventory of the donor’s assets and liabilities, the value and dates of prior donations, the applicable property regime, and the identities of all surviving compulsory heirs.

What Evidence Should Children Preserve?

A potential claim for reduction or collation ordinarily requires evidence showing the transfer and its effect on the hereditary estate. Relevant documents may include:

• The deed of donation or other transfer instrument;
• Titles, tax declarations, bank records, and registration documents;
• Marriage, birth, and death certificates establishing the family relationships;
• The donor’s will, if any;
• Records of other donations and gratuitous transfers; and
• An inventory and valuation of the donor’s assets and debts at death.

Evidence of the property regime between the spouses may also be important. Property may belong exclusively to one spouse, to the community or conjugal partnership, or to a co-ownership arrangement. Only the donor’s legally transferable interest may be considered in determining the effect of the donation.

What Are the Main Legal Risks in Estate Planning?

Spouses who transfer substantial property to each other should not assume that the transfer is immune from later scrutiny. A donation may be valid between the parties during their lifetimes but still be reduced after the donor’s death if it impairs the legitime of compulsory heirs.

Estate planning should therefore account for both present ownership and future succession. The donor should determine whether the transfer is inter vivos or mortis causa, whether the instrument satisfies the required formalities, and whether the transaction leaves sufficient property for the children’s legitimes.

Children, on the other hand, should distinguish a legally compensable impairment from a mere dissatisfaction with the parent’s distribution plan. The claim must be supported by a complete computation of the hereditary estate and the shares reserved by law.

Conclusion

Donations between spouses are not automatically invalid merely because the donor has children. They may, however, be reduced to the extent that they exceed the donor’s disposable portion and impair the legitimes of compulsory heirs.

The proper analysis requires consideration of the Civil Code rules on legitime, disposable portion, reduction, collation, and donations during marriage. Families should obtain a complete inventory, verify the ownership and value of the transferred properties, identify all compulsory heirs, and determine whether the transaction was a donation inter vivos or a donation mortis causa.

For estate planning, the safest course is to document the transaction accurately and test its effect against the children’s legally reserved shares. For heirs, any challenge should be based on a specific computation showing the precise amount by which the legitime was impaired.

About Nicolas and De Vega Law Offices

 Nicolas and de Vega Law Offices is a full-service law firm in the Philippines.  You may visit us at the 16th Flr., Suite 1607 AIC Burgundy Empire Tower, ADB Ave., Ortigas Center, 1605 Pasig City, Metro Manila, Philippines.  You may also call us at +632 84706126, +632 84706130, +632 84016392 or e-mail us at [email protected]. Visit our website https://ndvlaw.com.